I'm ashamed of what I did.
I have always considered myself an
urbanist. Specifically and especially an anti-car urbanist. I was
proud of the fact that I did not own a car until I finally got
married and had kids. Kids are the biggest excuse we tell ourselves
about why we succumb to the car fetish. We are stealing time from
them if we do not use a car. But I'm not ashamed of that.
I have seen cities where cars are not
king. Or at least parts of cities. When I first saw the French
Quarter of New Orleans I was amazed at how big it was. I had always
pictured it in my mind as a single corner around the famous
iron-trellised picture of Bourbon street. That it extended a mile in
one direction and a mile and a quarter in the other I had not
expected. Cars are allowed in the French Quarter just like cars were
allowed in the Maxwell Street market of the Chicago of yore. But you
only take a car if you absolutely must. Say you are an invalid and
your wheel-chair is broken or the battery is dead. Or you pay really
big bucks to have a house there with a parking space.
Otherwise the pedestrian is king in the
French Quarter. Even bicycles must moderate their pace.
When I got to Paris, France I was
amazed. The car in Paris is still overly worshiped, don't get me
wrong. But in the last 15 years, I am told, there has been steady push back.
First they never finished the special car speedway along the Seine.
Then they took over entire lanes of many streets to convert to bus
and bike only. Paris always a walkable city became even more
walkable.
Amsterdam is the only city where I was
anxious about all the bicyclers. There the bicycle is closest to
king. Since trollies traverse the central city, with a day-pass one
walks and trams it with ease.
Edgewater we are told is one of, if not
the densest neighborhood in the city. The wall of highrises fronting
the lake along with the corridor's four-plus-ones and bigger provide
the density for a quality urban environment. It's no accident that
our two Dominicks were snapped up by Mariano's and Wholefoods.
Edgewater also has the diversity a
quality urban environment needs. With middle middle-class in the
high-rises and lower middle-class in the corridor and upper
middle-class in Lakewood-Balmoral and Edegewater Glen we make space
for that diversity. We are indeed privileged to live here.
But with privilege comes
responsibility. We are privileged to live so close to the lake for
instance. We are privileged to have very high quality transit both
in the el and the express buses on Sheridan. Some of us are even privileged to own single family homes with garages in this dense
quality urban environment.
It is that last privilege that led me
astray into NIMBYism. I supported and actively worked for, both as an
individual and as a community leader, efforts to prevent buildings
beyond four stories on the west side of Broadway between Devon and
Hollywood. I was even given the chance to recognize my NIBMY status
when an architect friend pointed out that narrower Paris streets
commonly house six, seven and eight story buildings. In my defense I
will claim that I was swept away by my desire to get along with my
neighbors. Peer pressure, you know.
My own block was already protected by
zoning that prevents larger than three or six flats. And across the
street the zoning only allows for single family homes. But like the
NRA, I likely saw encroachment of bigger buildings on the west side of
Broadway as a slippery-slope to th3 taking away of my home for a
high-rise. Single family homes don't kill high-rises, people kill
high-rises.
There will be future fights, pitting
automobilist change against pedestrianist change. Higher buildings
are denser buildings. Urban culture is about density. If we did not
foster urbanism there would come a time when all would be sub-urban.
Don't get me wrong. I think it is important that Edgewater have a
single family quarter like mine. I just need to know my place. If I
don't like density, I can always move to the suburbs.
No comments:
Post a Comment